Open Access

On the complexity of miRNA-mediated regulation in plants: novel insights into the genomic organization of plant miRNAs

  • Moreno Colaiacovo1,
  • Antonella Lamontanara1,
  • Letizia Bernardo1,
  • Renzo Alberici1,
  • Cristina Crosatti1,
  • Lorenzo Giusti1,
  • Luigi Cattivelli1 and
  • Primetta Faccioli1Email author
Contributed equally
Biology Direct20127:15

https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6150-7-15

Received: 2 February 2012

Accepted: 8 May 2012

Published: 8 May 2012

Abstract

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are endogenous small non-coding RNAs of about 20–24 nt, known to play key roles in post-transcriptional gene regulation, that can be coded either by intergenic or intragenic loci. Intragenic (exonic and intronic) miRNAs can exert a role in the transcriptional regulation and RNA processing of their host gene. Moreover, the possibility that the biogenesis of exonic miRNAs could destabilize the corresponding protein-coding transcript and reduce protein synthesis makes their characterization very intriguing and suggests a possible novel mechanism of post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression.

This work was designed to carry out the computational identification of putative exonic miRNAs in 30 plant species and the analysis of possible mechanisms involved in their regulation.

The results obtained represent a useful starting point for future studies on the complex networks involved in microRNA-mediated gene regulation in plants.

Keywords

Gene regulation Exonic miRNA miRNA self regulation Plants

Findings

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are endogenous small non-coding RNAs of about 20–24 nt that can be coded either by intergenic or intragenic loci.

In plants a few examples of intronic miRNAs have been found in Arabidopsis and rice. In Arabidopsis, miR402 has been identified within the intron of gene At1g77230 in the same orientation as the hosting pre-mRNA [1]. A putative mirtron, miR1429.2, has also been identified in rice by Zhu et al. [2] as part of a homeobox gene. In Arabidopsis the intronic miR838 is particularly interesting being located in the intron of Dicer-like 1 (Dcl1) gene (which codes the key enzyme involved in plant miRNA maturation,[3]), and thus enabling a self-regulatory mechanism that helps maintain DCL1 homeostasis [4].

The rice miR3981 was detected in the exon of a putative glyoxalase gene and its biogenesis pathway might be involved in the regulation of glyoxalase expression. Excessive levels of glyoxalase mRNA should lead to an increase in pre-miR3981 processing by the enzyme DCL1 and with glyoxalase also being a putative target for miR3981, an increase in the amount of miRNA3981 could lead to a decrease in glyoxalase mRNA levels, thus preventing durable high expression of the gene [5]. This suggests the possibility of a balanced competition, mediated by DCL1, between glyoxalase protein production and miR3981 biogenesis leading to a fine-tuning of glyoxalase expression in rice. The possibility that the biogenesis of exonic miRNAs destabilizes the corresponding protein-coding transcript and reduces protein synthesis makes their characterization very intriguing and suggests a new mechanism of post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression.

This work was designed to carry out the computational identification of putative exonic miRNAs in plants by taking advantage of the huge amount of ESTs available for many species. The analysis of putative miRNA target sites in the host mRNA was also performed in order to gain some insight into possible novel mechanisms of gene regulation.

TCs (Tentative Consensus), from 30 plant species, publicly available from the DFCI Gene Index Project (http://compbio.dfci.harvard.edu/tgi/), were computationally screened for the presence of miRNA precursors and miRNA target sites (Additional file 1detailed methods can be found as additional file). TCs hosting miRNA precursors are reported in Additional file 2. Some of the annotated TCs refer both to a miRNA and a protein and thus represent the starting point for the identification of candidate exonic miRNAs.

The relationships between miRNAs and transcription factors (TFs) is particularly relevant, being the basis of complex regulatory networks [6, 7] and several examples of TF genes hosting microRNA precursor sequence were found and are reported in aAdditional file 2: examples include AP-2, NAC and SPL coding genes. Interestingly, in some of the miRNA-containing TCs identified in this study, the miRNA host gene is also its conserved target, for example miR444, a monocot-specific miRNA identified in several monocots (barley, maize, purple false brome, rice, wheat), is part of TCs coding for MADS-box transcription factors (Additional file 2) and this family of transcription factors is also a well-known conserved target for miR444. Additional file 3 contains the example of the barley EST called GH228935 [GenBank: GH228935], which is a MADS-box-related sequence containing both the target site for miR444b (+/−) and the precursor sequence for miR444a (+/+).

All TCs or singletons that include both a miRNA precursor sequence and one or more miRNA target sites are presented in Table 1. TCs that include both a miRNA target site with +/− orientation and the miRNA precursor sequence with +/+ orientation on the coding strand can be referred to those cases where the miRNA is oriented on the same strand of the target gene. The presence of the target sequence upstream or downstream of the precursor sequence could affect both host gene post-transcriptional regulation as well as miRNA regulation or self-regulation in the case that the target site belongs to the same miRNA family as the miRNA precursor. The latter mechanism could be a further buffering system for modulation of miRNA expression and could be in accordance with the model of miRNA self-regulation proposed by Meng et al. [6, 7] that suggests a feedback model in which the miRNA* binds to the complementary sites on their precursor thus exerting a cleavage-based modulating role. Examples of putative self-regulation based on the presence of a target site upstream or downstream of the precursor have been found in our data for miR444 as reported above, miR395 (rice), miR159/319 (soybean), miR1118 (wheat) and miR1219 (moss).
Table 1

Reports those TCs or singletons that include both a miRNA precursor sequence and one or more miRNA target sites

Species name

Scientific name

Sequence identifier

Annotation from DFCI

Gene Index

miRNA family

Target site (+/-)

Precursor site

Arabidopsis

Arabidopsis thaliana

TC360779

pentatricopeptide (PPR) repeat-containing protein

5652

1102–1122

261-708 (+/-)

161

1093–1113

400

1314–1334

  

TC383702

 

5636

 

89–166 (+/−)

    

173

444–465

 

Barley

Hordeum vulgare

GH228935

MIKC-type MADS-box transcription factor WM32A

444

246–266

280–393 (+/+)

Cotton

Gossypum hirsutum

TC244560

 

2949

 

366–547 (+/−)

  

399–511 (+/−)

3476

469–488

  

TC273521

Uncharacterized protein YJR115W

2949

 

1544–1723 (+/−)

  

1576–1689 (+/−)

3476

1647–1666

Maize

Zea mays

TC498468

Transcriptional regulator, TetR family

168

 

42–145 (+/+)

396

814–833

Moss

Physcomitrella patens

NP13127877

 

1219

535–555

263–414 (+/−)

Medicago truncatula

Medicago truncatula

EX529600

 

2629

 

171–231 (+/−)

2627

173–194

  

NP7251801

 

5241

 

1186–1260 (+/+)

1510

674–694

5242

1341–1361

 

2678

86–106

 
  

NP7252398

 

5241

 

1163–1280 (+/+)

  

1186–1260 (+/+)

  

1189–1255 (+/+)

1510

674–694

5242

1341–1361

2678

86–106

  

NP7252404

 

5241

 

1189–1255 (+/+)

1510

674–694

2678

86–106

  

NP7254391

 

2674

 

467–760 (+/+)

2089

200–221

Moss

Physcomitrella patens

TC19973

RNA polymerase II largest subunit

899

 

323–544 (+/+)

2083

416–436

217–236

  

TC24438

Predicted protein

1062

 

378–561 (+/+)

529

581–600

  

TC27593

Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase small chain

899

 

48–269 (+/–)

2083

354–374

154–174

Rice

Oryza sativa

CB677501

Os05g0439200 protein

156/157

 

219–338 (+/+)

  

252–352 (+/+)

168

217–236

  

CX099912

 

156

 

187–351 (+/+)

  

220–320 (+/+)

168

205–224

  

EG709456

Conserved protein

2118

 

109–285 (+/+)

1869

239–259

  

CA760441

 

395

539–559

373–441 (+/−)

230–397 (+/−)

87–154 (+/−)

Soybean

Glycine max

BW657280

Transcriptional regulator, MarR family

4414

 

164–291 (+/+)

159/319

123–144

  

TC425684

Chromosome chr14 scaffold_190, whole genome shotgun sequence

4409

 

479–539 (+/+)

5372

 

346–410 (+/+)

5674

373–393

  

TC428562

Transcriptional regulator, MarR family

4414

 

563–690 (+/+)

319

522–543

  

TC442024

MATE efflux family protein

159/319

324–343

358–460 (+/+)

  

TC443643

 

5668

 

717–829 (+/−)

1510

697–717

  

TC451566

 

5038

 

424–574 (+/+)

  

482–556 (+/+)

5670

567–586

Spruce

Picea abies

EX343185

 

3700

 

281–358 (+/+)

947

215–236

  

EX369017

 

3700

 

217–294 (+/+)

947

151–172

Wheat

Triticum aestivum

TC369361

Calmodulin TaCaM2-1

1118

727–749

918–1057 (+/+)

  

TC370181

Calmodulin TaCaM2-3

1118

644–666

835–974 (+/+)

On the other hand, those TCs where the orientation of miRNA precursor sequence with respect to coding strand is +/− should refer to those miRNAs coded in the antisense orientation with respect to the host gene. Antisense transcription associated with miRNA target mRNAs have been previously discovered in Arabidopsis [8] and may serve as a link between miRNA and RNA silencing pathways, suggesting that miRNAs may have additional roles in post-transcriptional regulation that are independent of cleavage.

TCs or singletons coding for more than one miRNA precursor (miRNA clusters) have also been identified both in the +/+ and +/− orientations (sense/antisense miRNAs) and are summarized in Additional file 4. The occurrence of pairs of antisense miRNAs in plants has been previously reported [9]. Most of the miRNA clusters highlighted in plants contain several members of a specific miRNA family rather than encoding miRNA with unrelated sequences, as is frequently the case for animal miRNA clusters [10]. Examples of plant miRNA clusters with members of different families are reported in Additional file 3.

Among the exonic miRNAs identified, we chose to explore, as an interesting example, the relationship between miR1118 and calmodulin-coding genes in wheat (Table 1). Calmodulin genes are of particular interest due to the fundamental role of calmodulin in the calcium-dependent regulation during plant response to endogenous and exogenous stimuli [11]. Calmodulin-binding proteins have already been shown to be targeted by miRNAs in plants [12], while no report is available on miRNA targeting to calmodulin itself.

Many plant species possess calmodulin (CaM) multigene families composed of several genes: some of which encode identical proteins, while others encode different isoforms of calmodulin-related proteins. In wheat, at least 13 CaM-related genes have been identified and classified into four subfamilies (SF-1:4 on the basis of their nucleotide sequence) coding for three distinct isoforms named TaCaM-I, TaCaM-II and TaCaM-III [13]. Genes from SF-1, SF-3 and SF-4 encode for the same isoform (TaCaM-I, the most similar to calmodulin from other plant species and organisms), while SF-2, the most divergent calmodulin subfamily with most recent origin in wheat, encodes at least two isoforms (TaCaM-II and TaCaM-III).

To deeply characterize the calmodulin gene family for the presence of miRNA-coding sequences, ten cDNA clones corresponding to 10 different genes encoding calmodulin-like proteins were screened against the wheat miRNA mature sequences present in miRBase. Each cDNA clone contained at least part of the 5′UTR, the full coding region, the 3′-UTR and the polyA tail. Blast output is reported in Additional file 5. The most significant match was found for tae-miR1118 mature sequence (score 43, e-value 2e-006), furthermore, an additional miRNA (tae-miR1125 mature sequence) showed a very significant match (score 39; e-value 2e-005). Both miRNAs were found in the two genes belonging to SF-2 (TaCaM2-1 and TaCaM2-2), but not in the third sequence belonging to the same subfamily (TaCaM2-3). Mature sequences for both miRNAs are included in the 3′UTR regions of the two calmodulin genes. Although the coding sequences of TaCaM2-1 and TaCaM2-2 are substantially different and produce two distinguishable calmodulin isoforms (TaCaM-III and TaCaM-II, respectively), the corresponding 3′UTR regions differ only by one nucleotide. The nucleotide sequence alignment between the 3′ UTR regions of the three calmodulin genes belonging to SF-2 revealed a striking difference between TaCaM2-3 and the other two genes: TaCaM2-1 and TaCaM2-2 share a long insertion of 239 bp that is absent in TaCaM2-3 (Figure 1 and Additional file 6). A Blast search against the complete TREP database, containing a collection of repetitive DNA sequences from different Triticeae species, highlighted a strong match (score 315, e-value 1e-86) of the inserted sequence with a DNA transposon of the Mariner class called DTT_Polyphemus_464G14-3. This finding is in agreement with a possible model for the evolution of MIR genes that proposes their origin from transposable elements, on the basis of the observation that the DNA-type nonautonomous elements called MITE (miniature inverted-repeat transposable element) can fold into imperfect stem loops that are typical of miRNA precursors [3]. Several pieces of evidence pointed to plant mariner-like elements (MLEs) as the autonomous partners of the nonautonomous Stowaway MITEs [14].
Figure 1

Reports the positions of miR1118 and miR1125 coding sequences inside wheat SF-2 calmodulin genes ( TaCaM2-1 , TaCaM2-2 , TaCaM2-3 ).

The presence of the transposon-related insertion in calmodulin genes from other plant species has was investigated, and a blast search using the sequence of TaCaM2-2 gene as query was performed. The results are reported in Additional file 7: a significant match with the 3′UTR region of the wheat gene was detected only with a barley gene, where, however, the transposon-related sequence was absent.

Moreover, while the miR1125 precursor sequence deposited in the miRBase found a significant match (81% identity) entirely included in the inserted sequence, the miR1118 precursors sequence matched (100% identity) only partially into the insertion while it spanned also the very last part of the 3′UTR of the TaCaM genes (Figure 1). The reverse complement sequence for miR1118 found inside the 239 nt insertion could thus represent a target site for the same miRNA. This is very possible since only 3 mismatches were found when compared with the mature sequence, and the target site is also predicted by psRNAtarget. A second reverse complement site is also shared by all three SF-2 genes (TaCaM2-1, TaCaM2-2 and TaCaM2-3), being located in the last part of the 3′ UTR region. This site corresponds to the miRNA* of the precursor deposited in the miRBase and it can be considered a less likely target site due to the high number of mismatches with the mature sequence. However, the prediction of the RNA secondary structures by mFold software (Additional file 8) highlighted the worse energetic stability of the miR1118 precursor stored in miRBase compared to that of the inserted sequence (−32.5 kcal/mol vs.−117.6 kcal/mol). Although the transposable element is longer than the deposited precursor (239 nt vs. 140 nt) it has a Minimal Folding Energy Index (MFEI) higher than the miRNA precursor (1.16 vs. 0.59) and it is in better agreement with the values known for plant miRNAs. The existence of two alternative miR1118 precursors could thus be possible. The inserted sequence has acquired some mutations since the insertion event and these variations have led to a better stability of the candidate miRNA precursor, thus confirming this hypothesis. In fact, compared with the inserted sequence, the predicted secondary structure of the transposable element stored in the TREP database shows a worse stability (−84.4 kcal/mol), a lower MFEI (0.88) and a higher number of mismatches (4) between miRNA and miRNA*.

Conclusions

Recently Meng et al. [6, 7] reported on the high dynamicity of the regulatory activities mediated by miRNAs which are themselves strictly regulated, thus making the miRNA-involved networks more robust.

The results presented in this work can be considered as a valuable support for future studies on the complex networks involved in miRNA-mediated gene regulation in plants. In particular the relationships between miRNAs and transcription factors (TFs) represent a key node of these complex networks. Most of the currently available studies have been involved in the identification of TF recognition sites in the promoter of miRNA genes and in the identification of miRNA target sites in TF coding genes. The present work adds a novel level of complexity pointing out the possibility that miRNA coding sequences can also be hosted by TF genes.

Open peer review

Reviewed by Dr Alexander Max Burroughs (nominated by Dr L Aravind) and Dr Raya Khanin (nominated by Arcady Mushegian). For the full reviews, please go to the Reviewers’ comments section.

Reviewers: This article was reviewed by Dr Alexander Max Burroughs (nominated by Dr L Aravind) and Dr Raya Khanin (nominated by Arcady Mushegian).

Reviewers’ comments

Reviewer’s report 1

Dr Alexander Max Burroughs (nominated by Dr L Aravind)

The authors probe TCs and identify several miRNA precursors. What is missing from this analysis is a sense of the novelty of the findings. How many of these precursors have previously been predicted as being present at in the genome at the identified locations? For reasonably well-annotated genomes like Arabidopsis or rice it should be relatively easy to look at this to provide an overview of how many times novel locations are identified for known miRNAs. If this count is large, it may be interesting to discuss why these have not been identified in the past.

Author response: In order to clarify this aspect, we checked all the miRNA genomic locations as they are reported in miRBase, and we compared them with the location of the identified TCs. We performed the analysis only for Arabidopsis sequences, which are supposed to be better annotated. Almost all pairs miRNA-TC show overlapping locations, meaning that the two pieces of information were previously known to the scientific community. However, the novelty of our work is that we merged these existing data and we were able to extract novel findings which are relevant for the miRNA analysis, e.g. the characterization of these miRNA precursors as exonic miRNAs.

As an additional form of evidence it might be useful, when available, to map deep-sequencing data to the TCs in order to confirm the presence and active processing of the identified precursors, particularly any identified in novel locations. In addition, one limitation in the analysis is that it precludes detection of previously unidentified miRNA precursors, an angle which could be addressed by feeding the deep-sequencing data mappings into a miRNA prediction program (based on parameters like mature/star sequence count distribution, folding properties, etc.) like miRanalyzer or miRdeep. This could increase the number of transcripts potentially harboring exonic miRNA precursors.

Author response: Small RNA sequencing is an interesting further development for this work and we plan to have new data in the near future which will be part of another publication. At the moment we are in the process of sequencing small RNAs from several plant species, and this will give us the opportunity to study also novel microRNAs.

I was struck by the general lack of conservation in the locations of the identified precursors: few seemed to be located in homologous transcripts across different plant species. While the authors discuss an example of conservation of the miR444 precursor, it might be informative to give an overview of the general conservation/lack of conservation observed in the localization of precursors in host transcripts. Are transcripts harboring both the precursor and the miRNA target sequence more likely to be conserved? This could provide some general insight into the mobility of the precursors and their role in “cis-regulation” of transcripts.

Author response: According to our analysis, there are few miRNA precursors which are present in conserved transcripts across different species. Of all the miRNA families which were identified in multiple species, approximately 20% show host conservation in at least two species. The situation is similar if we consider transcripts harboring both the precursor and the target site. A possible explanation for this finding could be the different level of completeness of species-specific gene indices (e.g. accuracy of TC annotations).

The authors note “On the other hand, those TCs where the orientation of miRNA precursor sequence with respect to coding strand is +/− should refer to those miRNAs coded in the antisense orientation with respect to the host gene. Antisense transcription associated with miRNA target mRNAs have been previously discovered in Arabidopsis and may serve as a link between miRNA and RNA silencing pathways…” This is a very interesting observation and quite consistent with a growing number of studies linking antisense transcription at gene loci to RNAi pathways. It might be worthwhile to scan existing gene annotations for evidence of downstream, noncoding antisense transcription which could overlap the gene body in +/− cases; this could provide some global evidence in support of the statement.

Author response: We manually inspected all the +/− cases which we identified in Arabidopsis (chosen for the same reasons reported above, i.e. the accuracy of genome annotation), then exploring the TAIR genome browser and looking for evidences of antisense transcription at those locations. We found evidence for antisense transcription in 38% of the cases.

Outside of the analysis of the calmodulin transcripts, there was little discussion of the predicted folding energies for the identified precursors. It could be instructive to see how secondary structure stabilities in the identified precursor compare to other precursors in individual genomes, foremost as a gauge of the reliability of the identified precursors, particularly those precursors identified in novel locations (see first comment).

Author response: The criteria which we used for the prediction of miRNA precursors are very stringent, since we selected as putative miRNAs only those sequences which have a nucleotide identity greater than 95% with a known precursor. Because of this, we don’t expect big changes in the energetic stability of the identified sequences compared to the ones stored in miRBase. The variations are supposed to be minimal and should not affect dramatically the miRNA stability. However, in order to confirm our expectation, we selected some miRNAs at random and we compared their energy values to the corresponding sequence stored in miRBase, by using the mFold software. The differences are small: ath-MIR416 has a free energy equal to −27.9 kcal/mol if we consider the miRBase sequence, and −31 kcal/mol if we consider our sequence; the same is true also for ath-MIR398b (−51.5 vs −51.4), ath-MIR319b (−81.3 vs −80.4) and osa-MIR439d (−57.8 vs −60.8).

Reviewer’s report 2

Dr Raya Khanin (nominated by Arcady Mushegian)

Results are given as flat files. The paper would benefit from organizing the results in a searchable database.

Author response: We are planning to set up a searchable database with all the relevant information.

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Keith Anthony Grimaldi for helping with the preparation of the manuscript. This work has been supported by “Mappa 5A” and “Drupomics” projects (Italian Ministry for Agriculture).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
CRA-Genomics Research Centre, Agricultural Research Council

References

  1. Sunkar R, Zhu JK: Novel and stress-regulated microRNAs and other small RNAs from Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2004, 16: 2001-2019. 10.1105/tpc.104.022830.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Zhu Q-H, Spriggs A, Matthew L, Fan L, Kennedy G, Gubler F, Helliwell C: A diverse set of microRNAs and microRNA-like small RNAs in developing rice grains. Genome Res. 2008, 18 (9): 1456-1465. 10.1101/gr.075572.107.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Voinnet O: Origin, biogenesis and activity of plant microRNAs. Cell. 2009, 136 (4): 669-687. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.046.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Rajagopalan R, Vaucheret H, Treio J, Bartel DP: A diverse and evolutionary fluid set of microRNAs in Arabidopsis thaliana. Gene Dev. 2006, 20 (24): 3407-3425. 10.1101/gad.1476406.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Li T, Li H, Zhang YX, Liu JY: Identification and analysis of seven H2O2-responsive miRNAs and 32 new miRNAs in the seedlings of rice (Oryza sativa L. ssp indica). Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39 (7): 2821-2833. 10.1093/nar/gkq1047.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Meng Y, Shao C, Wang H, Chen M: The regulatory activities of plant microRNAs: a more dynamic perspective. Plant Physiol. 2011, 157 (4): 1583-1595. 10.1104/pp.111.187088.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Meng Y, Shao C, Chen M: Toward microRNA-mediated gene regulatory networks in plants. Brief Bioinform. 2011, 12 (6): 645-659. 10.1093/bib/bbq091.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Luo QJ, Samanta MP, Köksal F, Janda J, Galbraith DW, Richardson CR, Ou-Yang F, Rock CD: Evidence for antisense transcription associated with microRNA target mRNAs in Arabidopsis. PLOS Genet. 2009, 5 (4): e1000457-10.1371/journal.pgen.1000457.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Zhang B, Pan X, Stellwag EJ: Identification of soybean microRNAs and their targets. Planta. 2008, 229 (1): 161-182. 10.1007/s00425-008-0818-x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Axtell MJ, Snyder JA, Bartel DP: Common functions for diverse smallRNAs of land plants. Plant Cell. 2007, 19 (6): 1750-1769. 10.1105/tpc.107.051706.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Kim MC, Chung WS, Yun DJ, Cho MJ: Calcium and calmodulin-mediated regulation of gene expression in plants. Mol Plant. 2009, 2 (1): 13-21. 10.1093/mp/ssn091.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Manila TM, Riju A, Lakshmi Priya Darshini K, Chandrasekar A, Eapen SJ: In silico microRNA identification from paprika (Capsicum annuum) ESTs. Nature Precedings. 2009, [http://hdl.handle.net/10101/npre.2009.3737.1]Google Scholar
  13. Yang T, Segal G, Abbo S, Feldman M, Fromm H: Characterization of the calmodulin gene family in wheat: structure, chromosomal location and evolutionary aspects. Mol Gen Genet. 1996, 252 (6): 684-694. 10.1007/BF02173974.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Feschotte C, Swamy L, Wessler SR: Genome-wide analysis of mariner-like transposable elements in rice reveals complex relationships with Stowaway Miniature Inverted Repeat Transposable Elements (MITEs). Genetics. 2003, 163 (2): 747-758.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Dai X, Zhao PX: psRNATarget: a Plant Small RNA Target Analysis Server. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, Web Server IssueGoogle Scholar
  16. Kozomara A, Griffiths-Jones S: miRBase: integrating microRNA annotation and deep-sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39: D152-D157. 10.1093/nar/gkq1027.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Zuker M: Mfold web server for nucleic acid folding and hybridization prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31: 3406-3415. 10.1093/nar/gkg595.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Colaiacovo et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.