Skip to main content

Table 11 Classification scores obtained for the C1 test set using different methods

From: Environmental metagenome classification for constructing a microbiome fingerprint

  NYCOFAPXOSCLOverall accuracy
Harris et al. [32]#correct05105 
 PPV0.831.001.00ACC=0.667
 TPR0.001.001.001.00 
Walker and Datta [22]#correct4192 
 PPV0.671.000.750.50ACC=0.533
 TPR0.400.200.900.40 
Zhu [25]#correct3574 
 PPV5.000.581.00ACC=0.633
 TPR0.301.000.700.80 
Chierici et al. [23]#correct100105 
 PPV0.671.001.00ACC=0.833
 TPR1.000.001.001.00 
Our method using Mash#correct0342 
sketch size=1000PPV110.5ACC=0.300
 TPR00.60.40.4 
Our method using Mash#correct0365 
sketch size=10000PPV111ACC=0.467
 TPR00.60.61 
Our method using Mash#correct0354 
sketch size=100000PPV111ACC=0.400
 TPR00.60.50.8 
Our method using CoMeta#correct10424 
(class-level filtering)PPV0.911.000.911.00ACC=0.667
 TPR1.000.801.000.80 
Our method using CoMeta#correct104104 
(sample-level filtering)PPV0.911.001.001.00ACC=0.933
 TPR1.000.800.200.80 
  1. We report the number of correctly classified samples (#correct), precision (PPV), and recall (TPR) for each class, as well as the overall accuracy (ACC)