Training set (5-fold CV results) | Test set | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A. Performance comparison | ||||||||
Method (n) | Error (%) | GBS | BCM | AUPR | Error (%) | GBS | BCM | AUPR |
SAMGSR (30)a | 40.7 | 0.279 | 0.377 | 0.462 | 51.3 | 0.348 | 0.407 | 0.486 |
W-SAMGSR (27)a | 37.2 | 0.276 | 0.378 | 0.453 | 51.3 | 0.345 | 0.405 | 0.492 |
LASSO (95) | 38.6 | 0.281 | 0.458 | 0.483 | 52.7 | 0.395 | 0.456 | 0.485 |
pSVM (>100) | 42.8 | 0.370 | 0.344 | 0.428 | 53.3 | 0.433 | 0.385 | 0.397 |
gelnet (>400) | 36.6 | 0.284 | 0.346 | 0.416 | 54.7 | 0.343 | 0.377 | 0.489 |
RRFE (>200) | 36.6 | 0.272 | 0.395 | 0.448 | 54 | 0.336 | 0.410 | 0.468 |
B. Performance of the top 3 teams in sbv NSCLC sub-challenge (among 54 teams) | ||||||||
Study (size) | Training data used/Method used | Error (%) | GBS | BCM | AUPR | |||
Ben-Hamo’s (23) | GSE10245, GSE18842, GSE31799/PAM | 49.3 | -- | 0.48 | 0.46 | |||
Tarca’s (25) | GSE10245, GSE18842, GSE2109/moderated t-tests + LDA | -- | -- | 0.459 | 0.454 | |||
Tian’s (66) | GSE10245, GSE18842, GSE2109/TGDR in hierarchical way | 53.3 | 0.374 | 0.440 | 0.471 |